Harshit Rana's T20I debut as concussion substitute sparks controversy
The decision, approved by match referee Javagal Srinath, has drawn criticism, particularly from England captain Jos Buttler, after his side fell short by 15 runs in their bid to level the series.
India's decision to bring in pacer Harshit Rana as a concussion substitute for all-rounder Shivam Dube in the fourth T20I against England in Pune has led to widespread controversy among fans and pundits alike.
The decision, approved by match referee Javagal Srinath, has drawn criticism, particularly from England captain Jos Buttler, after his side fell short by 15 runs in their bid to level the series.
Dube, who played a crucial role with a match-defining half-century, was struck on the helmet by a short delivery from Jamie Overton on the penultimate ball of India's innings. As a result, he was withdrawn under concussion protocols, leading to the introduction of Rana, who went on to play a pivotal role in England's unsuccessful chase. The young pacer claimed three wickets in his four-over spell, significantly impacting the outcome of the match.
Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel
Former England captain Alastair Cook expressed his bewilderment at Rana's inclusion as a replacement for the hard-hitting all-rounder. Speaking to TNT Sports, Cook remarked, "Replacing a big-hitting batting all-rounder, who has bowled just one over in the IPL [in 2024], with a specialist bowler who can't bat but bowls heavy seam makes no sense."
Cook further criticised the decision, stating, "It seems absolute madness that such a substitution is permitted. Credit to the lad on debut, but he shouldn't have been allowed to play. It gave the Indian captain another brilliant option."
Michael Vaughan also took to social media to voice his concerns, posting: "How can an out-and-out bowler replace a batter who bowls part-time?"
The controversy was not limited to the English camp, as similar reactions emerged from India. Former opener Aakash Chopra questioned the validity of Rana's inclusion as a like-for-like substitute. "It's not really a like-for-like replacement if Harshit bowls… which he should. Ramandeep Singh was the ideal 'concussion replacement' for Dube," Chopra wrote on X.
With questions now being raised over the interpretation and enforcement of the concussion substitute rule, this episode has reignited debate over whether stricter guidelines are needed to ensure fair and consistent application in international cricket.
