Can we have better choices for protests?
Road blockades are effective because they disrupt the daily flow of life, compelling authorities to respond. However, this method often alienates the public, who may otherwise sympathise with the protesters' cause
The July uprising, predominantly led by students, is a defining moment in our journey towards establishing Bangladesh 2.0. This hard-fought freedom, however, came at an immense cost, with thousands of students tragically losing their lives and many more enduring severe injuries.
Though we knew there would be challenges during this vital transition, we remain resolute in our commitment to seizing new opportunities and reevaluating the practices of the past administration.
With the inclusion of student representatives in the interim government, we are dedicated to advancing government initiatives, boosting the economy, and reforming the banking sector. We aim to foster a solid commitment to building a thriving and peaceful Bangladesh 2.0. We are optimistic about the positive changes that lie ahead.
As we experience protests and differing opinions, we embrace these expressions as essential to our shared journey towards growth and change, united in our pursuit of a brighter future.
Last week, while returning from a meeting in Uttara, I witnessed students from a nearby college blocking the street, demanding their college be recognised as a university. The demonstration brought vehicle movement to a standstill.
We view students as catalysts for societal change in the new Bangladesh. However, during the protest I mentioned, some of them not only blocked the road but also threw stones at a passing train, which injured several commuters.
Protests are an excellent way to showcase democracy, especially for marginalised groups looking to air their grievances. In Bangladesh, the scene has become so delightfully flexible that roadblocks have become the go-to protest method. Why take a leisurely stroll when students, RMG workers, drivers of Bangla Tesla vehicles, and even a handful of friends can throw up a roadblock and demand attention? It's all the rage these days!
Road blockades are effective because they disrupt the daily flow of life, compelling authorities to respond. However, this method often alienates the public, who may otherwise sympathise with the protesters' cause.
In Dhaka, a city already grappling with chronic traffic congestion, blocked streets exacerbate the plight of commuters, students, and emergency services. Highways connecting the capital are lifelines for trade and commerce, and their obstruction disrupts supply chains, causing ripple effects across the economy.
This raises a critical question: Are there alternative ways to protest without creating problems for others?
By exploring examples from other countries, particularly in South Asia, we can identify strategies that balance the need for advocacy with public convenience.
Several countries, including those in South Asia, have adopted innovative and less disruptive protest methods that Bangladesh can draw inspiration from:
Silent marches and sit-ins
Silent marches and sit-ins are powerful, non-disruptive ways to make a statement. In India, the Shaheen Bagh protests during 2019-2020 showcased the effectiveness of peaceful sit-ins. Protesters, predominantly women, occupied a specific area without disrupting major roadways, drawing international attention to their cause. Similarly, silent marches, like those held by students in Nepal to demand educational reforms, create impactful visuals without inconveniencing the public.
Digital campaigns
In today's connected world, digital platforms provide a powerful medium for raising awareness. Hashtag movements, viral videos, and coordinated online campaigns have proven to be game-changers. For example, India's #MeToo movement gained traction through social media, bringing important issues to light without physical disruptions. By leveraging platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and TikTok, Bangladeshi protesters can amplify their message globally.
Flash mobs and performative art
Creative methods such as flash mobs and performative art are gaining traction as protest tools. In Sri Lanka, environmental activists have used street performances to highlight climate issues. These actions capture public attention without causing widespread inconvenience. In Bangladesh, artists could use similar strategies to address pressing concerns like workers' rights or education reforms.
Boycotts and economic pressure
Economic boycotts are another effective form of protest. In Pakistan, farmers have staged coordinated boycotts of markets to demand better prices for their produce. By withholding participation in specific economic activities, protesters can exert pressure on authorities without resorting to roadblocks. In Bangladesh, RMG workers could consider halting production temporarily or engaging in symbolic work slowdowns to highlight grievances.
Petitions and legal action
Organised petitions backed by mass signatures demonstrate widespread support for a cause. Public interest litigation (PIL) has been a critical tool for civil society in India. Groups have successfully used courts to demand environmental degradation and human rights action. Bangladeshi activists can leverage legal frameworks to address grievances, ensuring accountability without disrupting daily life.
Dialogue and negotiation
Dialogue is one of the best ways to solve conflicts. In Bhutan, community leaders help mediate between protesters and authorities to address issues before they turn disruptive. Bhutan measures its progress using Gross National Happiness for a reason. Bangladesh can create similar systems to build trust and cooperation between citizens and the government.
While these alternative methods hold promise, they are not without challenges. Bangladesh's protesters often resort to road blockades out of frustration, perceiving other methods as ineffective in drawing immediate attention. To promote alternatives, the government must be more responsive to peaceful protests and create platforms for constructive dialogue. Public trust in such mechanisms is critical to reducing disruptive demonstrations.
Additionally, protest organisers must recognise the value of public support. Alienating the very people who might champion their cause undermines long-term objectives. Adopting creative, non-disruptive methods can help protesters build broader coalitions of support while maintaining pressure on authorities.
Ultimately, the goal of any protest is to drive change. Bangladesh must balance advocacy and accountability to achieve this, adopting a constructive, inclusive dissent culture.
Shafiq R Bhuiyan is the Vice President of Communication and CSR at BRAC Bank PLC.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and views of The Business Standard.